In a meeting held with the goal of validating a set of requirements, two participants become involved in an in-depth discussion about the content of a requirement. One of the participants is of the opinion that the requirement must be realized as described, since the success of the product is otherwise jeopardized. The other party dissents and argues that this requirement cannot be realized technically as described.
What is the best way for you to react to this situation? (1 Point)
A . You note both arguments and let the project manager make the decision.
B . You invite all stakeholders to a workshop and try to reach agreement.
C . You prefer the second opinion since you believe that the discussion makes no sense if the requirement cannot berealized.
D . You get together with the affected stakeholders and attempt to reach an agreement on this.
Answer: D
Leave a Reply