An architect is helping an organization with the Logical Design of an NSX-T Data Center solution.
This information was gathered during the Assessment Phase:
– Customer Is concerned with NSX Manager availability.
– 3 cabinets/racks are available in the data center.
– No integration with 3rd party solution is required.
– There is no budget for physical equipment acquisition.
– The 3 cabinets/racks do not share the same L2 domain.
Which three should the architect include in their design to address the customer’s concern with NSX Manager availability? (Choose three.)
A . Use another NSX Manger IP in case an appliance falls.
B . Deploy 2 cold standby NSX Manager appliances in rack 2/3.
C . Deploy an NSX Manager Appliance per rack and cluster them.
D . Use a physical/internal load-balancer with the cluster.
E . Use separate IP per NSX Manager appliance per rack.
F . Deploy a single active NSX Manager appliance in rack 1.
Answer: C,D,E
Explanation:
Z C Customer is concerned with availability and NSX-T requires (except for labs)a 3x Mgr cluster must be deployed. You can use internal HA/VIP& vSphere HA for Mgmt cluster only when the mgrs. are on the same L2 domain. To do this you need an external load-balancer, the only one that would meet the “no 3rd party” & “no physical equipment acquisition” would be a NSX-T Edge LB though the only answer that lines up with that is (D) and its worded poorly. (F) and (B) are both wrong/worded even more poorly. (A) by itself isn’t right/wrong but when also looking at (E) then you know it doesn’t cut it. (C & E) are correct.
https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-NSX-T-Data-Center/2.4/installation/GUID-72A55651-0031-43A4-9F23-5950C1AFF304.html
https://vxplanet.com/2020/03/26/using-nsx-t-loadbalancer-for-the-nsx-t-management-cluster-part-1/&https://vxplanet.com/2020/03/26/using-nsx-t-loadbalancer-for-the-nsx-t-management-clusterpart-2/
Leave a Reply